Health and safety guidelines for schools' digital devices announced in Louisiana
"For my piece titled “Unmasked”, I painted myself.
Artwork by Maren Antee |
Artwork by Laney C. |
Information and advocacy for classroom screen safety
Health and safety guidelines for schools' digital devices announced in Louisiana
"For my piece titled “Unmasked”, I painted myself.
Artwork by Maren Antee |
Artwork by Laney C. |
FTC Scrutiny of Ed Tech practices is long overdue
The wooing of school district leaders, boards of education and pivotal politicians by the Ed Tech lobby has damaged children's health nationwide and put student data on the auction block.Now plagued with epidemic myopia, obesity, anxiety and addiction, all introduced and exacerbated by the schools' demands for nonstop screen use without any regard for the health of growing children, this generation of young people is also being laid bare by the exploitation of their private and student data.
Ed Tech platforms routinely demand sensitive data from students, sometimes requiring it before a student can even use the school resource. What else is a child supposed to do but provide the requested information, especially when the teacher directs the students to do so? The demand for personal data has become so ubiquitous at school, that kids now just hand over private details anytime they're asked to fill out any form for any reason. One platform even asks for students' personal email addresses so that they can 'stay in touch' even after graduation. These practices must end, and federal scrutiny of schools' online practices must begin.
It is now common practice for teachers and schools to collect highly private information without regard to how that data will be used, who can see it, what the implications may be for the child or family, how the students may be tracked, and without consideration for the students' personal or medical privacy. Starting at a very early age, students are instructed to share private information with people who should never have asked for it in the first place. And that includes biometrics in Phys Ed class and after school programs.
Students are poked, prodded and encouraged to share their most personal experiences, feelings, aspirations, college plans, and private family details with total strangers by way of endless school surveys - from the school yearbook staff to state sponsored behavioral research. "Does anyone in your household smoke cigarettes?" "How many siblings to do you have - what are their ages?" "Did either of your parents attend college?" Even the registration forms for public school are soaked in unnecessarily invasive demographic data collection to which families can only submit.
The mishandling of school-based data by local districts, acting as default data-gathering agents for Ed Tech, is long-standing and rarely corrected, even in the face of immense data breaches. Incredibly, the children's full names are often used as their school email log-ins. Their school devices often remain logged in since it's most convenient, making it also easy for someone else to access a child's school account using their device.
Does the school periodically change the students' passwords in keeping with basic security protocols? Never - it would be too cumbersome if kids were forever forgetting their new password. Convenience is prioritized over safety and security every single time, teaching students the very worst safety and security habits.
The school devices are then taken home, giving any person in the household easy access to any student email address in the system by way of the schools' email address book. Older siblings, guests, household workers or weird Uncle Hal could easily use that logged-in device, and have access to all the kids in the school system. What more could a child predator ask for? These practices are utterly reckless and have not been corrected despite the long-standing, obvious vulnerabilities and documented risks to students' safety.
The days of the sacred cow must end when it comes to data collection from Ed Tech platforms and the local school systems that feed them. Working in tandem, both the global Ed Tech corporations and the local schools endanger students' privacy, their families' privacy, and the physical safety of the children, who are put at risk by having their full name, age and home address accessible to bad actors. Parents nationwide find themselves defending their children from the aggressive or oblivious data gathering tactics employed by their own schools, who are supposed to be protecting our children, not putting them in harm's way.
Let's hope that the FTC's current efforts to identify and address these critical student privacy issues is successful, and the exploitation of students by Ed Tech platforms, over-reaching school districts and billion dollar tech industry lobbyists comes to a swift end.
Cindy Eckard
While Senators Chris Van Hollen and Ed Markey have led the funding to address the disparate access to digital technology, they have ignored the health risks introduced by the very devices they are so eager to provide.
A simple amendment to several of the bills they have sponsored or promoted could correct this: any device or connection funded by their legislation must be provided with the health and safety warnings published by the device makers themselves. That little pamphlet that provides fundamental consumer protection information must be distributed to the students and families who have been issued a device by any school system using federal funds.
My letter to Senator Chris Van Hollen:
Below please find my concerns regarding the SUCCESS Act and Emergency Connectivity Fund that the senator is co-sponsoring with Senator Ed Markey and others.
While
very well-intentioned, this effort currently ignores decades-long
medical evidence that the daily use of digital devices poses myriad
health risks with even worse outcomes for vulnerable, growing children.
OSHA regulated computer use for adults in 1997. The
CAMRA Act was originally introduced in 2007 -
14 years ago - by Joe Lieberman. The health impacts from daily tech
use have been a concern for decades.
But today, children are suffering from known hazards, without a single protection from a federal government that consistently funds ever more technology in schools. Although social media and recreational use of screens are cautioned against, somehow the schools' demand for digital device use keeps getting a pass. That's like saying seat belts are required - unless you're driving to school.
I am writing to ask that Senator Van Hollen introduce an amendment to both the SUCCESS Act and the ECF requiring that federal funding for educational technology comes with mandated student health and safety warnings as part of the package. Any school district or state educational entity using these funds should be required to provide to students and their families - at minimum - the health and safety warnings published by the device makers themselves.
If Senator Van Hollen buys a laptop, explicit health and safety warnings are provided in the packaging. But when a student gets a school-issued laptop, that fundamental documentation is withheld. That growing child is required to use a hazardous tool that OSHA regulated for adults decades ago, without any health or safety warnings at all. This is as much a consumer safety issue for students as it is anything else.
Without at least fundamental protections, the accelerated distribution and use of digital devices among growing children will continue to damage them, sometimes, for a lifetime. Myopia and obesity are two of the greatest threats facing students who spend their days sitting and staring into a screen - made worse by remote learning and by less outdoor play, less recess, and sleep disturbances introduced by the screen's blue light. Disadvantaged kids suffer these impacts more than other groups because they also lack good nutrition and safe places to play outside. Each of these conditions introduces the potential for life-long health issues ranging from glaucoma and diabetes to heart disease and depression.
Maryland, Virginia and Texas have passed health and safety lawsA recent report, entitled, Children's Health in the Digital Age was published in The International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. It warns that "the health of future generations may be severely compromised if nothing is done to raise public awareness about the necessity for regulatory measures at individual and institutional levels that will effectively prompt children to change and self-monitor their interactions with digital environments wherever possible."
A simple amendment could raise awareness, introduce safer habits and save this generation of kids from avoidable harm - I hope that Senator Van Hollen will take that important step forward on their behalf.
Perhaps this information may inspire other Senators or Representatives to take appropriate actions and ensure that students are not harmed by their school-issued devices.
Cindy Eckard
OSHA/NIH Graphic |